Last Updated: August 22 2026
Are late fees in Ontario sometimes illegal, and what should a business or consumer do if a contract late fee looks like disguised interest?
Late fees can be illegal in Canada when they function as disguised interest, including when the effective charge implies more than sixty (60%) percent per annum or when the fee exceeds genuine disbursement costs; courts can treat these as improper penalties, including under Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, s. 347. In practice, the key question is whether the “late fee” truly correlates to collection/disbursement recovery or instead operates like interest for extended credit. If you’re a consumer or business owner in Ontario dealing with a contract late fee, contact Thamar Bilingual Legal Services Ontario for bilingual paralegal help in English and français at (647) 818-7974 to review your clause and advise next steps.
Add this website to Google Preferred Sources
When Is a Late Fee An Illegal Penalty
A business will sometimes use the threat of additional fees as a financial motivator to encourage customers to make timely payments; however, a contract may become unlawful and unenforceable if a contract contains an illegal late fee. A late fee is illegal, if the amount violates the Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, section 347, wherein it is prescribed that charging interest rate beyond a rate of sixty (60%) percent per annum is a criminal act. Any contract that prescribes an interest rate in excess of the maximum allowable sixty (60%) percent is therefore an illegal contract; Garland v. Consumers' Gas Co., [1998] 3 S.C.R. 112. Do note that a severability clause may save the entire contract from becoming void.
Note: Please contact Thamar Bilingual Legal Services Ontario by phone at: (647) 818-7974 to discuss any specific questions that you may have.
Although a business may try to disguise interest by labeling an interest charge as a late fee, courts will carefully review whether the late fee is indeed an interest charge as additional monies due from the providing of credit on the balance overdue. An exception applies if it is shown that the late fee genuinely correlates to the recovery of a disbursement cost incurred in the collection of the debt rather than as an additional fee correlated to the further advancement of the debt; De Wolf v. Bell ExpressVu Inc., 2009 ONCA 644; Garland, supra.
As an example, consider a business that imposes a ten 00/00 ($10.00) dollar late fee when a monthly payment of one hundred 00/00 ($100.00) is overdue by seven (7) days. This late fee actually calculates as a ten (10%) percent additional charge upon the actual amount due. This ten (10%) percent late fee imposed upon a one week overdue account produces an exorbitant, and unlawful, five hundred twenty (520%) percent annual interest rate. Note that the fact that this interest appears lower, and actually does calculate lower, over a greater period of time, it is the trigger date that causes the unlawfulness. While the $10.00 late fee charged on the 7th day is unlawful, it might appear that if six months later the same $10.00 is still outstanding that the amount, by then, is a lawful twenty (20%) percent interest; however, the very fact that the amount was unlawful when originally imposed continues to make the amount unlawful. What was at first unlawful fails to become lawful.
Conclusion
When an agreement contains a clause for late fees or other form of delayed payment penalty, such is viewed as an attempt to charge interest on monies due. Where the late fees, as a disguised interest, calculate to an interest rate beyond the legally allowable interest rate, the late fees are viewed as unlawful. Furthermore, even if the interest rate may be legal, late fees or a payment penalty that goes beyond the costs of recovering the genuine amount due are, generally, deemed unenforceable.
