If An Act of God, Such As Coronavirus, Makes a Contract Impossible to Complete, What Happens?

If a Contract Contains a Force Majeure Clause Specific to a Type of Incident the Parties May Become Excused. The Doctrine of Frustrated Contracts May Also Excuse Parties When An Incident Makes a Contract Impossible to Perform.
Similar Questions About Frustrated Contracts Include:

  • Is It a Breach of Contract If a Storm Makes Something Impossible?
  • What Happens to Contracts When a State of Emergency Is Declared?
  • Can a Person Be Sued For Breach of Contract Despite Coronavirus?
  • How Does the Law Treat Contracts Made Impossible Due to a Pandemic?
  • Are Businesses Required to Fulfill Contracts Despite Coronavirus?

A Helpful Guide on How to Determine What Constitutes a Frustrated Contract and Thereby Waives Obligation to Perform

Contact Document Regarding Performance Made Impossible By Force Majeure Event When an unforeseeable situation occurs such as an unusually extreme storm or government ordered closures due to pandemic, among other things, such an incident is legally referred to as a force majeure. Often a force majeure results in a party, or parties, to a contract, becoming unable to fulfill obligations within a contract due to the force majeure incident that involves something extreme as well as outside and beyond the control of the parties to the contract. In such a situation, when a party, or parties, become incapable of performing the contract due to the impossibility arising unexpectedly due to the force majeure, the party, or parties, become legally excused from the obligations within the contract and the failure to fulfill the agreed terms is treated in law as a non-breach.

Frequently a contract will lack terms or specifics that address the force majeure circumstances as such was typically outside the thoughts of the parties when the contractual agreement was made. Despite a lack of express terms, the common law doctrine of frustration of contract may remain applicable.  Furthermore, in Ontario, the doctrine of frustration of contract is embodied within statute law per the Frustrated Contracts Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. F.34 which says, among other things:

Application of Act

2 (1) This Act applies to any contract that is governed by the law of Ontario and that has become impossible of performance or been otherwise frustrated and to the parties which for that reason have been discharged.


(2) This Act does not apply,

(a) to a charterparty or a contract for the carriage of goods by sea, except a time charterparty or a charterparty by way of demise;

(b) to a contract of insurance; or

(c) to a contract for the sale of specific goods where the goods, without the knowledge of the seller, have perished at the time the contract was made, or where the goods, without any fault on the part of the seller or buyer, perished before the risk passed to the buyer.

Adjustment of Rights and Liabilities

3 (1) The sums paid or payable to a party in pursuance of a contract before the parties were discharged,

(a) in the case of sums paid, are recoverable from the party as money received for the use of the party by whom the sums were paid; and

(b) in the case of sums payable, cease to be payable.


(2) If, before the parties were discharged, the party to whom the sums were paid or payable incurred expenses in connection with the performance of the contract, the court, if it considers it just to do so having regard to all the circumstances, may allow the party to retain or to recover, as the case may be, the whole or any part of the sums paid or payable not exceeding the amount of the expenses, and, without restricting the generality of the foregoing, the court, in estimating the amount of the expenses, may include such sum as appears to be reasonable in respect of overhead expenses and in respect of any work or services performed personally by the party incurring the expenses.


(3) If, before the parties were discharged, any of them has, by reason of anything done by any other party in connection with the performance of the contract, obtained a valuable benefit other than a payment of money, the court, if it considers it just to do so having regard to all the circumstances, may allow the other party to recover from the party benefitted the whole or any part of the value of the benefit.

Assumed Obligations

(4) Where a party has assumed an obligation under the contract in consideration of the conferring of a benefit by any other party to the contract upon any other person, whether a party to the contract or not, the court, if it considers it just to do so having regard to all the circumstances, may, for the purposes of subsection (3), treat any benefit so conferred as a benefit obtained by the party who has assumed the obligation.

Severe Damaging Storms

Examples of a force majeure incident that may frustrate a contract are often those such as extreme weather events.  A tornado that destroys an event venue seems a plain and obvious example whereas a tornado strike was likely unforeseeable at the time parties entered into a contract for use of an event venue.  With this said, it is possible that some weather events would fail to qualify as a force majeure, such as a snowstorm during the winter season whereas although the snowstorm may be signficant, a snowstorm, even a major snowstorm, is generally a reasonably foreseeable possibility; however, a three-day freezing rain storm, with collapse of hydro-electric towers and loss of major parts of the electrical service grid as occurred in 1998, would more likely be viewed as a force majeure or contract frustrating incident.

Public Emergency Issues

Recently, the COVID-19 pandemic (coronavirus) resulted in the cancellation of many events, activities, services, among other things.  In many cases, contracts of various sorts will be affected both directly and indirectly whereas some agreements may become impossible to perform or the performance may become moot.  Parties to contracts for which the performance of such contracts is adversely affected by the coronavirus should contact a legal professional, such as Thamar Abdu Paralegal to carefully review whether legal obligations or legal rights are affected, including whether the doctrine of frustrated contract may apply and to discuss the available legal remedies, if any.

Summary Comment

The concept of force majeure involves an unforseeable incident, usually occurring naturally, that interferes with the capacity to fulfill a contract.  Parties to a contract may be exempted from contract performance if the type of force majeure incident occurs as described within a contract.  Furthermore, the doctrine of frustrated contract, which is codified within the Frustrated Contracts Act, may also exempt parties from performance of contract and entitle return of deposits or payment for the value of partially completed contracts that are made impossible to complete due to outside forces beyond the fault of the parties.

Thamar Abdu Paralegal provides affordable legal help and professional representation including contract law services for clients located in Mississauga, Burlington, Mississauga, Etobicoke, Halton Hills, among other places!

Need Help? Let's Get Started Today

ATTENTION: Do not send any confidential information through this website form.  Use this website form only for making an introduction.

For more information, fill out the form below to send a direct inquiry to Thamar Abdu Paralegal

ATTENTION: Confidential details about your case must not be sent through this website.  Use of this website does not establish a legal-representative/client relationship.  Do not include confidential details about your case by email or phone.  Use this website only for an introduction with a Thamar Abdu Paralegal representative.
Thamar Abdu Paralegal

90 Matheson Blvd. W., Suite 101
Mississauga, Ontario,
L5R 3R3

P: (905) 819-6950
P: (647) 491-6777
E: thamar@thamarabdu.com

Hours of Business:

9:00AM – 5:00PM
9:00AM – 5:00PM
9:00AM – 5:00PM
9:00AM – 5:00PM
9:00AM – 5:00PM

By appointment only.  Call for details.
Messages may be left anytime.